{"id":5231,"date":"2020-09-09T11:20:13","date_gmt":"2020-09-09T02:20:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/?p=5231"},"modified":"2021-05-24T21:08:57","modified_gmt":"2021-05-24T12:08:57","slug":"exercises-determinants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/articles\/exercises-determinants\/","title":{"rendered":"Exercises: Determinants"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"box\">\n<p>This set of exercises is retrieved from the eighth chapter of Linear Algebra by Robert J. Valenza. Note that these solutions are not fully elaborated; You have to fill the descriptions by yourself.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.1<\/span><br \/>\nUsing the recursive definition given in the proof of the existence of determinant, systematically evaluate the determinant of the following matrix:<br \/>\n\\[A=\\begin{pmatrix}1&#038;2&#038;1\\\\0&#038;1&#038;1\\\\1&#038;0&#038;2\\end{pmatrix}.\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det (A)<br \/>\n&#038;= 1 \\cdot \\det \\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 1 &#038; 1 \\\\ 0 &#038; 2 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n&#8211; 2 \\cdot \\det \\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 0 &#038; 1 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n+ 1 \\cdot \\det \\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 0 &#038; 1 \\\\ 1 &#038; 0 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 1 \\times 2 &#8211; 2 \\times (-1) + 1 \\times (-1) = 3.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.2<\/span><br \/>\nFor any angle \\(\\theta,\\) evaluate the determinant of the matrix<br \/>\n\\[M_\\theta  = \\left(<br \/>\n\\begin{array}{cr} \\cos\\theta &#038; -\\sin \\theta \\\\ \\sin \\theta &#038; \\cos \\theta \\end{array}<br \/>\n\\right).\\]<br \/>\nRecall that this is the matrix of rotation about the origin by the angle \\(\\theta.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\det ( M_\\theta ) = \\cos^2 \\theta -(-\\sin ^2 \\theta ) = 1 .\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.3<\/span><br \/>\nShow that for \\(A\\in M_n (K)\\) and \\(\\lambda \\in K,\\) \\(\\det (\\lambda A) = \\lambda^n \\det(A).\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A^j\\) be the \\(j\\)th column of \\(A,\\) that is,<br \/>\n\\[A = (A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, A^3 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, A^n ).\\]<br \/>\nThen<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det (\\lambda A)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det((\\lambda A^1 ,\\, \\lambda A^2 ,\\, \\lambda A^3 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, \\lambda A^n )) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\lambda \\det(( A^1 ,\\, \\lambda A^2 ,\\, \\lambda A^3 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, \\lambda A^n )) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\lambda ^2 \\det(( A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, \\lambda A^3 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, \\lambda A^n )) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038; \\quad \\quad \\vdots \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\lambda ^n \\det(( A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, A^3 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, A^n )) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\lambda ^n \\det(A).<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.4<\/span><br \/>\nShow that if a matrix has a row or column of \\(0 \\text{&#8216;s,}\\) then its determinant is \\(0.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A = (a_{ij})\\in M_n (K)\\) and suppose that \\(p\\)th row consists only of \\(0,\\) that is, \\(a_{pj}=0\\) for \\(j=1,\\,2,\\,\\cdots,\\,n.\\) Calculating the determinant of \\(A\\) along the \\(p\\)th row, we have<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{p+j} a_{pj} \\det(\\partial_{pj} A) \\\\[4pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{p+j} \\cdot 0 \\cdot \\det(\\partial_{pj} A) =0.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.5<\/span><br \/>\nShow that the determinant of a matrix is unchanged if we add a scalar multiple of one column to another.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A = (a_{ij})\\in M_n (K),\\) and let \\(A^j\\) be the \\(j\\)th column of \\(A,\\) that is,<br \/>\n\\[A = (A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, A^n ).\\]<br \/>\nConsider the operation<br \/>\n\\[kA^p + A^q \\,\\rightarrow\\, A_q \\quad (p\\ne q)\\]<br \/>\non \\(A\\) and let \\(B\\) be the result.<br \/>\nDefine<br \/>\n\\[b_{ij} = \\begin{cases}<br \/>\nk &#038; \\text{if} \\, (i,\\,j) = (p,\\,q) \\\\[5pt]<br \/>\n0 &#038; \\text{otherwise,}<br \/>\n\\end{cases}\\]<br \/>\nand take<br \/>\n\\[R = (r_{ij})_{n\\times n}= I_n + (b_{ij})_{n\\times n}.\\]<br \/>\nThen we have<br \/>\n\\[AR = B.\\]<br \/>\nBut for<br \/>\n\\[\\det(\\partial_{pq} R)=0\\]<br \/>\nand<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(R)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i+q} r_{iq} \\det(\\partial_{iq} R) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i+q} \\delta_{iq} \\det(\\partial_{iq} R) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(I_n) = 1,<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]<br \/>\nwe have<br \/>\n\\[\\det(AR) = \\det(A)\\det(R) = 1\\cdot \\det(A) = \\det(A).\\]<br \/>\nAs an example, let \\(n=3\\) and consider \\(A = (a_{ij})_{3\\times 3}.\\) Suppose that \\(k\\) is a nonzero real number and we are given the operation<br \/>\n\\[kA^2 + A^3 \\,\\rightarrow\\, A^3 ,\\]<br \/>\nthat is, the result of the operation is<br \/>\n\\[B = [A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, kA^2 + A^3 ].\\]<br \/>\nObserve that<br \/>\n\\[AR=\\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} a_{11} &#038; a_{12} &#038; a_{13} \\\\ a_{21} &#038; a_{22} &#038; a_{23} \\\\ a_{31} &#038; a_{32} &#038; a_{33} \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n\\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} 1 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 1 &#038; k \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n=<br \/>\n[A^1 ,\\, A^2 ,\\, kA^2 + A^3 ].\\]<br \/>\nSince<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(R)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} 1 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 1 &#038; k \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 0 \\cdot \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 0 &#038; 1 \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 \\end{array}\\right] &#8211; k\\cdot\\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 1 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 \\end{array}\\right] + 1\\cdot\\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 1 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 0 + 0 + \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 1 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right] = 1 = \\det(I_3 ),<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]<br \/>\nwe have<br \/>\n\\[\\det(B) = \\det(AR) = \\det(A)\\det(R) = \\det(A)\\cdot 1 = \\det(A).\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.6<\/span><br \/>\nConsider the matrix<br \/>\n\\[A = \\begin{pmatrix}<br \/>\nx_1 &#038; a_1 &#038; b_1 \\\\<br \/>\nx_2 &#038; a_2 &#038; b_2 \\\\<br \/>\nx_3 &#038; a_3 &#038; b_3<br \/>\n\\end{pmatrix}\\]<br \/>\nin \\(M_3 (K),\\) where the \\(a\\text{&#8216;s}\\) and \\(b\\text{&#8216;s}\\) are fixed and the \\(x\\text{&#8216;s}\\) may vary. Show that the set of all \\((x_1,\\,x_2,\\,x_3)\\) such that \\(\\det(A)=0\\) is a subspace of \\(K^3\\) of dimension at least \\(2.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A^j\\) be the \\(j\\)th column of \\(A.\\)<\/p>\n<p>If \\(A^2,\\) \\(A^3\\) are linearly dependent, then \\(\\det(A)=0\\) for any \\((x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\,x_3 ).\\) Hence<br \/>\n\\[\\left\\{ (x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\,x_3 ) \\,\\vert\\, \\det(A) =0\\right\\} = \\mathbb{R}^3.\\]<br \/>\nWe now consider the case that \\(A^1,\\) \\(A^2\\) are linearly independent. Then<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A)=0\\]<br \/>\nif and only if<br \/>\n\\[(x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\,x_3) = \\lambda_2 A^2 + \\lambda_3 A^3\\]<br \/>\nfor some scalars \\(\\lambda_2\\) and \\(\\lambda_3 .\\) That is,<br \/>\n\\[\\left\\{ (x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\,x_3 )\\,\\vert\\,\\det(A)=0\\right\\} = \\operatorname{Span}(A^2 ,\\,A^3 ).\\]<br \/>\nHence this set constitutes a \\(2\\)-dimensional subspace of \\(\\mathbb{R}^3.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.7<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the matrix<br \/>\n\\[A=\\begin{pmatrix}<br \/>\n0&#038;1&#038;0&#038;0&#038;0\\\\<br \/>\n0&#038;0&#038;1&#038;0&#038;0\\\\<br \/>\n0&#038;0&#038;0&#038;0&#038;1\\\\<br \/>\n1&#038;0&#038;0&#038;0&#038;0\\\\<br \/>\n0&#038;0&#038;0&#038;1&#038;0<br \/>\n\\end{pmatrix}.\\]<br \/>\nThis is an example of a <span class=\"defined\">permutation matrix<\/span> since it acts by permuting the canonical basis vectors of \\(K^5.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\(A\\) is expressible by<br \/>\n\\[A = [ {\\mathbf{e}}_4 ,\\, {\\mathbf{e}}_1 ,\\, {\\mathbf{e}}_2 ,\\, {\\mathbf{e}}_5 ,\\, {\\mathbf{e}}_3 ].\\]<br \/>\nSince<br \/>\n\\[\\left(\\begin{array}{ccccc} 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 3 &#038; 4 &#038; 5 \\\\ 4 &#038; 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 5 &#038; 3 \\end{array}\\right)\\]<br \/>\nis an even permutation, we need even number of column-exchange operations to make \\(A\\) as the identity matrix. Hence we have \\(\\det(A) =1.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.8<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the following matrix using expansion by any row or column as appropriate.<br \/>\n\\[A = \\left(\\begin{array}{ccrc}<br \/>\n1&#038;1&#038;-1&#038;2 \\\\<br \/>\n0&#038;1&#038;2&#038;0 \\\\<br \/>\n4&#038;0&#038;3&#038;1 \\\\<br \/>\n0&#038;2&#038;0&#038;0<br \/>\n\\end{array} \\right).<br \/>\n\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nAlong the \\(4\\)th row, we have<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= -0 \\cdot \\det (\\partial_{41} A) + 2 \\cdot \\det(\\partial_{42} A) &#8211; 0 \\cdot \\det(\\partial_{43} A) + 0\\cdot \\det(\\partial_{44} A) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 2\\cdot \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{crc} 1 &#038; -1 &#038; 2 \\\\ 0 &#038; 2 &#038; 0 \\\\ 4 &#038; 3 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 2 \\times 2 \\times \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 1 &#038; 2 \\\\ 4 &#038; 1 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 2 \\times 2 \\times (-7) = -28.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.9<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the following matrix using expansion by any row or column as appropriate.<br \/>\n\\[A = \\left(\\begin{array}{ccrc}<br \/>\n0&#038;1&#038;-1&#038;2 \\\\<br \/>\n1&#038;1&#038;2&#038;0 \\\\<br \/>\n4&#038;0&#038;2&#038;-1 \\\\<br \/>\n3&#038;2&#038;0&#038;4<br \/>\n\\end{array} \\right).<br \/>\n\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nAlong the \\(2\\)nd column, we have<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\cdot \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{ccr} 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 0 \\\\ 4 &#038; 2 &#038; -1 \\\\ 3 &#038; 0 &#038; 4 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n+1 \\cdot \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{crr} 0 &#038; -1 &#038; 2 \\\\ 4 &#038; 2 &#038; -1 \\\\ 3 &#038; 0 &#038; 4 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n+2 \\cdot \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{crr} 0 &#038; -1 &#038; 2 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 0 \\\\ 4 &#038; 2 &#038; -1 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times (8-6-32) +1 \\times (3+16-12) + 2\\times (4-1-16) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times (-3) + 1\\times 7 + 2\\times (-13) = 11.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.10<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the following matrix without expanding by either rows or columns.<br \/>\n\\[A = \\begin{pmatrix}<br \/>\n1&#038;1&#038;5 \\\\ 2&#038;0&#038;2 \\\\ 4&#038;0&#038;0<br \/>\n\\end{pmatrix}.<br \/>\n\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nUsing the rule of Sarrus, we have<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= 1 \\times 0 \\times 0 + 1 \\times 2 \\times 4 + 5 \\times 2 \\times 0 \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;\\quad\\quad -1 \\times 2 \\times 0 &#8211; 1 \\times 2 \\times 0 &#8211; 5 \\times 0 \\times 4 \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;=8.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.11<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the matrix<br \/>\n\\[A= \\left( \\begin{array}{crcc}<br \/>\n2 &#038; -1 &#038; 3 &#038; 1 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 2 &#038; 2 &#038; 0 \\\\<br \/>\n3 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 &#038; 0 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 2 &#038; 0<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right).\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times \\det(\\partial_{14} A) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} 0 &#038; 2 &#038; 2 \\\\ 3 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 2 \\end{array}\\right]\\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times 2 \\times \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{cc} 0 &#038; 2 \\\\ 3 &#038; 0 \\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -1 \\times 2 \\times (-6) = 12.<\/p>\n<p>\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.12<\/span><br \/>\nEvaluate the determinant of the matrix<br \/>\n\\[A= \\begin{pmatrix}<br \/>\n2 &#038; 6 &#038; 1 &#038; 8 &#038; 0 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 4 &#038; 5 &#038; 7 &#038; 1 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 4 &#038; 9 &#038; 7 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 &#038; 5 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 &#038; 0<br \/>\n\\end{pmatrix}.\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;=-\\det \\left[\\begin{array}{ccccc}<br \/>\n2 &#038; 6 &#038; 1 &#038; 0 &#038; 8 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 4 &#038; 5 &#038; 1 &#038; 7 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 4 &#038; 7 &#038; 9 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 5 &#038; 1 \\\\<br \/>\n0 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 1<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right] \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= -2 \\times 4 \\times 4 \\times 5 \\times 1 = -160.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.13<\/span><br \/>\nConsider a matrix \\(A = \\left( a_{ij} \\right) \\in M_n (K)\\) whose elements are all zero above the <span class=\"defined\">minor diagonal<\/span> (from bottom left to top right). Give a succinct formula for the determinant of \\(A.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nWe want to find the number of column-exchange operations to make \\(A\\) as an upper-triangular matrix. If \\(n=1,\\) then there is nothing to consider, hence assume that \\(n\\ge 2.\\) If \\(n=2,\\) only a single operation \\[A^1 \\,\\leftrightarrow\\,A^2\\] is needed. If \\(n=3,\\) then a single operation \\[A^1 \\,\\leftrightarrow A^3\\] is sufficient. If \\(n=4\\) or \\(n=5,\\) then two operations<br \/>\n\\[A^1 \\,\\leftrightarrow \\, A^n \\quad\\text{and}\\quad A^2 \\,\\leftrightarrow\\, A^{n-1}\\]<br \/>\nare needed.<\/p>\n<p>In general, if \\(n=4k\\) or \\(n=4k+1\\) where \\(k\\) is a positive integer, then \\(2k\\) operations are needed to make \\(A\\) as an upper-triangular matrix, and if \\(n=4k+2\\) or \\(n=4k+3,\\) then \\(2k+1\\) operations are needed. Hence if \\(n=4k\\) or \\(n=4k+1,\\) then<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A) = (\\text{product of minor diagonal entries of } A),\\]<br \/>\nand if \\(n=4k+2\\) or \\(n=4k+3,\\) then<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A) = -(\\text{product of minor diagonal entries of } A).\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.14<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A\\in M_n (K)\\) have factorization \\(A=LU\\) into the product of a lower triangular matrix \\(L\\) and an upper triangular matrix \\(U.\\) Show that the determinant of \\(A\\) is equal to the product of the diagonal terms in both \\(L\\) and \\(U.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(LU)\\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(L)\\cdot\\det(U) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= (\\text{product of diagonal entries of }L)<br \/>\n\\times \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;\\quad\\quad(\\text{product of diagonal entries of }U).<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.15<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A,\\,B\\in M_n(K)\\) and suppose that \\(A\\) is singular, i.e., not invertible. Show that the product \\(AB\\) is also singular.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince \\(\\det(A) =0,\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[\\det(AB) = \\det(A)\\det(B) = 0\\times \\det(B) =0.\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.16<\/span><br \/>\nSuppose that \\(A\\) is an invertible matrix such that both \\(A\\) and \\(A^{-1}\\) consist entirely of integers. Show that the determinant of \\(A\\) is either \\(+1\\) or \\(-1.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(\\det(A) =p,\\) \\(\\det(A^{-1})=q.\\) Since \\(A\\) and \\(A^{-1}\\) are integer matrices, both \\(p\\) and \\(q\\) are integers. Besides, since<br \/>\n\\[pq = \\det(A)\\det(A^{-1}) = \\det(AA^{-1}) = \\det(I_n) = 1,\\]<br \/>\nwe have \\(p=\\pm 1.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.17<\/span><br \/>\nConsider each of the elementary row operations(defined on matrices in Section 5.3). Analyze how each affects the determinant of a square matrix.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n(i) Interchanging two rows changes the sign of the determinant.<\/p>\n<p>(ii) Multiplication of a row by a scalar \\(k\\) multiplies the determinant by \\(k.\\)<\/p>\n<p>(iii) Addition of a scalar multiple of one row to another changes nothing of the determinant. (See Problem 5.)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.18<\/span><br \/>\nFor all \\(A\\in M_n(\\mathbb{R}),\\) prove that \\(\\det (AA^T ) \\ge 0.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(AA^T)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(A) \\det(A^T) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(A) \\det(A) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= (\\det(A))^2 \\ge 0.<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.19<\/span><br \/>\nProve that if \\(A\\) is similar to \\(B,\\) then \\(\\det (A) = \\det (B).\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nBy the definition of similarity, there is an invertible matrix \\(P\\) such that<br \/>\n\\[A = P^{-1}BP.\\]<br \/>\nHence<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det(A)<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(P^{-1}BP) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(P^{-1})\\det(B)\\det(P) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= (\\det(P))^{-1} \\det(B) \\det(P) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= \\det(B).<br \/>\n\\end{aligned}\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.20<\/span><br \/>\nProve that the following matrices are not similar.<br \/>\n\\[A = \\left( \\begin{array}{crc} 1 &#038; -1 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 2 &#038; 5 \\\\ 0 &#038; 0 &#038; 3 \\end{array}\\right) ,\\quad<br \/>\nB = \\left( \\begin{array}{rcc} 2 &#038; 0 &#038; 0 \\\\ -1 &#038; 4 &#038; 0 \\\\ 0 &#038; 3 &#038; 7 \\end{array}\\right).\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A) = 6 \\ne 56 = \\det(B),\\]<br \/>\ntwo matrices are not similar. (By the preceding problem.)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.21<\/span><br \/>\nDetermine whether the following set of vectors is linearly independent.<br \/>\n\\[(1,\\,2,\\,-1),\\,\\, (6,\\,0,\\,2),\\,\\, (4,\\,-4,\\,2).\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet<br \/>\n\\[A=\\left[\\begin{array}{rcr} 1 &#038; 6 &#038; 4 \\\\ 2 &#038; 0 &#038; -4 \\\\ -1 &#038; 2 &#038; 2 \\end{array}\\right].\\]<br \/>\nThen \\(\\det(A) = 24 \\ne 0.\\) Hence the family of column vectors of \\(A\\) is linearly independent, that is, the given vectors constitute a linearly independent family.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.22<\/span><br \/>\nShow that<br \/>\n\\[\\det \\begin{pmatrix} 1 &#038; x_1 &#038; x_1 ^2 \\\\ 1 &#038; x_2 &#038; x_2 ^2 \\\\ 1 &#038; x_3 &#038; x_3 ^2 \\end{pmatrix}<br \/>\n= \\left( x_2 &#8211; x_1 \\right) \\left( x_3 &#8211; x_1 \\right) \\left( x_3 &#8211; x_2 \\right).\\]<br \/>\nConclude that the vectors<br \/>\n\\[ (1,\\,x_1 ,\\,x_1^2 ),\\,\\, (1,\\,x_2 ,\\,x_2^2 ) ,\\,\\, (1 ,\\,x_3 ,\\,x_3 ^2 )\\]<br \/>\nare linearly independent if and only if \\(x_1 ,\\) \\(x_2 \\) and \\(x_3\\) are distinct. Generalize this to higher dimensions.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nWe immediately give the formula for the general case. Let<br \/>\n\\[A = \\left[\\begin{array}{ccccc}<br \/>\n1 &#038; x_1 &#038; x_1^2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; x_1^{n-1} \\\\<br \/>\n1 &#038; x_2 &#038; x_2^2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; x_2^{n-1} \\\\<br \/>\n1 &#038; x_3 &#038; x_3^2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; x_3^{n-1} \\\\<br \/>\n\\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\ddots &#038; \\vdots \\\\<br \/>\n1 &#038; x_n &#038; x_n^2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; x_n^{n-1}<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right].\\]<br \/>\nAs a polynomial of \\(x_1,\\) \\(x_2,\\) \\(\\cdots,\\) \\(x_n,\\) the degree of \\(\\det(A)\\) is<br \/>\n\\[1+2+3+\\cdots + (n-1) = \\frac{n(n-1)}{2}.\\]<br \/>\nIF \\(x_i = x_j\\) for \\(i > j,\\) then \\(det(A) =0;\\) Hence \\(\\det(A)\\) has the factor \\((x_i &#8211; x_j )\\) for all \\(i,\\) \\(j\\) such that \\(n \\ge i > j \\ge 1.\\) Consider<br \/>\n\\[p(x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\,x_n ) = \\prod_{i > j}(x_i &#8211; x_j).\\]<br \/>\nThen the degree of \\(p\\) is \\(n(n-1)\/2\\) which coincides the degree of \\(\\det(A),\\) and \\(p\\) has the factor \\((x_i &#8211; x_j )\\) for all \\(i,\\) \\(j\\) such that \\(n \\ge i > j \\ge 1.\\) Hence<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A) = kp(x_1 ,\\,x_2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\,x_n )\\]<br \/>\nfor some \\(k.\\)<\/p>\n<p>If we take the first term of each factor of \\(p,\\) then their product becomes<br \/>\n\\[x_2 \\, x_3 ^2 \\, x_4^3 \\cdots x_n^{n-1}\\]<br \/>\nwhich is the product of diagonal entries of \\(A.\\) This term is unique among the expansion of \\(p,\\) so is in \\(\\det(A).\\) Hence \\(k=1.\\)<\/p>\n<p>We conclude that the family of column vectors \\(A^1 ,\\) \\(A^2 ,\\) \\(\\cdots ,\\) \\(A^n\\) is linearly independent if and only if all \\(x_j &#8216; \\text{s}\\) are distinct.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.23<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(f_1,\\) \\(\\cdots ,\\) \\(f_n\\) be family of functions in \\(C^{\\infty} (\\mathbb{R}).\\) Note that if<br \/>\n\\[\\sum_{j=1}^n \\lambda_j f_j (x) =0\\]<br \/>\nfor some family of coefficients \\(\\lambda_j \\in \\mathbb{R},\\) then<br \/>\n\\[\\sum_{j=1}^n \\lambda_j f_j ^{(k)} (x) =0\\]<br \/>\nfor all \\(k\\ge 0.\\) With this background, show that if \\(f_1,\\) \\(\\cdots,\\) \\(f_n\\) are linearly dependent, then<br \/>\n\\[\\det \\begin{pmatrix}<br \/>\nf_1 &#038; f_2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n \\\\<br \/>\nf_1^{(1)} &#038; f_2^{(1)} &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n^{(1)} \\\\<br \/>\n\\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\ddots &#038; \\vdots \\\\<br \/>\nf_1^{(n-1)} &#038; f_2^{(n-1)} &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n^{(n-1)}<br \/>\n\\end{pmatrix} =0.\\]<br \/>\n(This is called the <span class=\"defined\">Wronskian determinant<\/span> of the family \\(f_1,\\) \\(\\cdots,\\) \\(f_n\\) and is critical in the theory of differential equation.)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince the family \\(f_1 ,\\) \\(f_2 ,\\) \\(\\cdots ,\\) \\(f_n\\) is linearly dependent, there exist scalars \\(\\lambda_j &#8216; \\text{s}\\) such that<br \/>\n\\[\\lambda_1 f_1 + \\lambda_2 f_2 + \\cdots + \\lambda_n f_n = 0\\]<br \/>\nand not all \\(\\lambda_j &#8216; \\text{s}\\) are zeros. Let<br \/>\n\\[A=\\left[\\begin{array}{ccccc}<br \/>\nf_1 &#038; f_2 &#038; f_3 &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n \\\\<br \/>\nf_1 ^{(1)} &#038; f_2 ^{(1)} &#038; f_3 ^{(1)} &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n ^{(1)} \\\\<br \/>\nf_1 ^{(2)} &#038; f_2 ^{(2)} &#038; f_3 ^{(2)} &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n ^{(2)} \\\\<br \/>\n\\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\ddots &#038; \\vdots \\\\<br \/>\nf_1 ^{(n-1)} &#038; f_2 ^{(n-1)} &#038; f_3 ^{(n-1)} &#038; \\cdots &#038; f_n ^{(n-1)}<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right].\\]<br \/>\nLet \\(A^j\\) be the \\(j\\)th column of \\(A.\\) Then<br \/>\n\\[\\lambda_1 A^1 + \\lambda_2 A^2 + \\cdots + \\lambda_n A^n = 0.\\]<br \/>\nHence the family of column vectors of \\(A\\) is linearly dependent. Consequently we have \\(\\det(A) =0.\\)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.24<\/span><br \/>\nUse the previous exercise to show that the functions \\(e^x,\\) \\(e^{2x}\\) and \\(e^{3x}\\) are linearly independent; that is, show that<br \/>\n\\[\\det \\begin{pmatrix} e^x &#038; e^{2x} &#038; e^{3x} \\\\ e^x &#038; 2e^{2x} &#038; 3e^{3x} \\\\ e^x &#038; 4e^{2x} &#038; 9e^{3x} \\end{pmatrix} \\ne 0.\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\\[\\begin{aligned}<br \/>\n\\det \\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} e^x &#038; e^{2x} &#038; e^{3x} \\\\ e^x &#038; 2e^{2x} &#038; 3e^{3x} \\\\ e^x &#038; 4e^{2x} &#038; 9e^{3x} \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n&#038;=<br \/>\n\\det \\left( e^x e^{2x} e^{3x} \\left[\\begin{array}{ccc} 1 &#038; 1 &#038; 1 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 3 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2^2 &#038; 3^2 \\end{array}\\right] \\right) \\\\[6pt]<br \/>\n&#038;=<br \/>\ne^x e^{2x} e^{3x}<br \/>\n\\det \\left[  \\begin{array}{ccc} 1 &#038; 1 &#038; 1 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2 &#038; 3 \\\\ 1 &#038; 2^2 &#038; 3^2 \\end{array}\\right]<br \/>\n\\ne 0.<\/p>\n<p>\\end{aligned}\\]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.25<\/span><br \/>\nUse Problem 22 and 23 to show that the collection of functions<br \/>\n\\[e^{\\lambda_1 x}, \\,\\, e^{\\lambda_2 x} ,\\,\\, \\cdots ,\\,\\, e^{\\lambda_n x} \\,\\,\\, ( \\lambda_j \\in \\mathbb{R} )\\]<br \/>\nis linearly independent if and only if the numbers \\(\\lambda_j\\) are distinct. This generalizes the previous problem.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIf \\(\\lambda_i = \\lambda_j\\) for some \\(i\\ne j,\\) then the family of given functions is linearly dependent.<\/p>\n<p>Suppose now that \\(\\lambda_j &#8216; \\text{s}\\) are all distinct. Let<br \/>\n\\[A = \\left[\\begin{array}{ccccc}<br \/>\ne^{\\lambda_1 x} &#038; e^{\\lambda_2 x} &#038; e^{\\lambda_3 x} &#038; \\cdots &#038; e^{\\lambda_n x} \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 e^{\\lambda_1 x} &#038; \\lambda_2 e^{\\lambda_2 x} &#038; \\lambda_3 e^{\\lambda_3 x} &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n e^{\\lambda_n x} \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 ^2 e^{\\lambda_1 x} &#038; \\lambda_2 ^2 e^{\\lambda_2 x} &#038; \\lambda_3 ^2 e^{\\lambda_3 x} &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n ^2 e^{\\lambda_n x} \\\\<br \/>\n\\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\ddots &#038; \\vdots \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 ^{n-1} e^{\\lambda_1 x} &#038; \\lambda_2 ^{n-1} e^{\\lambda_2 x} &#038; \\lambda_3 ^{n-1} e^{\\lambda_3 x} &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n ^{n-1} e^{\\lambda_n x} \\\\<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right].\\]<br \/>\nThen<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A) = e^{\\lambda_1 x} e^{\\lambda_2 x} \\cdots e^{\\lambda_n x} \\det\\left[\\begin{array}{ccccc}<br \/>\n1 &#038; 1 &#038; 1 &#038; \\cdots &#038; 1 \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 &#038; \\lambda_2 &#038; \\lambda_3 &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 ^2 &#038; \\lambda_2 ^2 &#038; \\lambda_3 ^2 &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n ^2 \\\\<br \/>\n\\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\vdots &#038; \\ddots &#038; \\vdots \\\\<br \/>\n\\lambda_1 ^{n-1} &#038; \\lambda_2 ^{n-1} &#038; \\lambda_3 ^{n-1} &#038; \\cdots &#038; \\lambda_n ^{n-1} \\\\<br \/>\n\\end{array}\\right] \\ne 0\\]<br \/>\nby the Problem 22. Hence by Problem 23, the family of \\(e^{\\lambda_j x}\\)&#8217;s is linearly independent.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.26<\/span><br \/>\nLet<br \/>\n\\[A= \\begin{pmatrix} 1 &#038; 0 &#038; 1 \\\\ 0 &#038; 2 &#038; 1 \\\\ 1 &#038; 4 &#038; 3 \\end{pmatrix}.\\]<br \/>\nFind \\(A^{-1}\\) or prove that it does not exist.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIf \\(A^j\\) is the \\(j\\)th column vector of \\(A,\\) then<br \/>\n\\[2A^1 + A^2 = 2A^3,\\]<br \/>\nthat is, the family of column vectors of \\(A\\) is not linearly independent. Hence \\(\\det(A) =0\\) and \\(A^{-1}\\) does not exist.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.27<\/span><br \/>\nShow that \\(\\operatorname{SL}_n(K)\\) is a subgroup of \\(\\operatorname{GL}_n(K).\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIf \\(A,\\) \\(B\\in \\operatorname{SL}_n (K),\\) then<br \/>\n\\[\\det(AB) = \\det(A)\\det(B) = 1\\times 1 = 1,\\]<br \/>\nhence \\(AB\\in\\operatorname{SL}_n (K).\\)<\/p>\n<p>If \\(A\\in\\operatorname{SL}_n (K),\\) then \\(\\det(A) =1.\\) Hence \\(A^{-1}\\) exists and<br \/>\n\\[\\det(A^{-1}) = (\\det(A))^{-1} = 1^{-1} = 1,\\]<br \/>\nthat is, \\(A^{-1} \\in \\operatorname{SL}_n (K).\\)<\/p>\n<p>Therefore \\(\\operatorname{SL}_n(K)\\) is a subgroup of \\(\\operatorname{GL}_n(K).\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.28<\/span><br \/>\nConsider \\(2\\times 2\\) matrix<br \/>\n\\[A = \\begin{pmatrix} a &#038; b \\\\ c &#038; d \\end{pmatrix}.\\]<br \/>\nLet \\(P = (a,\\,c)\\) and \\(Q = (b,\\,d)\\) be the points in \\(\\mathbb{R}^2\\) defined by the columns of \\(A.\\) These points span a parallelogram whose vertices are \\(\\mathbf{0},\\) \\(P,\\) \\(Q\\) and \\(P+Q.\\) Find the area of this object.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nKeep calm and sketch a picture to derive<br \/>\n\\[\\left\\lvert \\det(A) \\right\\rvert.\\]\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--\n<!-- ########## ########## ########## --\n\n\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 8.<\/span><br \/>\nQ\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"solution\">\n\n\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span>\n(To be filled.)\n<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n--><\/p>\n<p><!--\n\\[\n\\left(\n\\begin{array}{cccr|c}\n1 & 0 & 3 & -1 & 0 \\\\\n\\hline\n0 & 1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\\\\n0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\\\\n\\end{array}\n\\right)\n\\]\n--><\/p>\n<p><!-- --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This set of exercises is retrieved from the eighth chapter of Linear Algebra by Robert J. Valenza. Note that these solutions are not fully elaborated; You have to fill the descriptions by yourself. Problem 8.1 Using the recursive definition given in the proof of the existence of determinant, systematically evaluate the determinant of the following matrix: \\(A=\\begin{pmatrix}1&#038;2&#038;1\\\\0&#038;1&#038;1\\\\1&#038;0&#038;2\\end{pmatrix}.\\) Solution. \\(\\begin{aligned} \\det (A) &#038;= 1 \\cdot&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[417,402,400,412,414],"class_list":["post-5231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-linear-algebra","tag-determinant","tag-exercises","tag-linear-algebra","tag-linear-transformation","tag-matrix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5231"}],"version-history":[{"count":80,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5231\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6484,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5231\/revisions\/6484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}