{"id":4931,"date":"2020-08-23T23:41:32","date_gmt":"2020-08-23T14:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/?p=4931"},"modified":"2020-09-24T20:12:01","modified_gmt":"2020-09-24T11:12:01","slug":"exercises-groups-and-group-homomorphisms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/articles\/exercises-groups-and-group-homomorphisms\/","title":{"rendered":"Exercises: Groups and Group Homomorphisms"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"box\">\n<p>This set of exercises is retrieved from the second chapter of Linear Algebra by Robert J. Valenza. Note that these solutions are not fully elaborated; You have to fill the descriptions by yourself.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.1<\/span><br \/>\nGive an example of a noncommutative group of \\(24\\) elements.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\(S_4 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.2<\/span><br \/>\nGive an example of a group \\(G\\) and a nonempty subset \\(H\\) of \\(G\\) which is closed under the operation defined on \\(G,\\) but is not a subgroup of \\(G.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(G = \\mathbb{Z}\\) and the operation be the ordinary addition. Take \\(H\\) be the set of positive integers. Then \\(H\\) is a subset of \\(G\\) and is closed under the ordinary addition. But \\(H\\) is not a group, because any element of \\(H\\) does not have an inverse element in \\(H.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.3<\/span><br \/>\nShow that a group \\(G\\) is commutative if and only if the following statement holds:<br \/>\n\\[(st)^{-1} = s^{-1} t^{-1} \\text{  for all  } s,\\, t \\in G .\\tag{*}\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIf \\(G\\) is commutative, then<br \/>\n\\[(st)^{-1} =(ts)^{-1} = s^{-1} t^{-1}.\\]<br \/>\nNow we prove the converse. Suppose (*) holds. Let \\(x,\\) \\(y\\) be elements of \\(G.\\) Since \\(G\\) is a group, the inverse elements \\(x^{-1}\\) and \\(y^{-1}\\) exist in \\(G.\\) Therefore, taking \\(s= x^{-1}\\) and \\(t = y^{-1} ,\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[xy = (x^{-1})^{-1} (y^{-1})^{-1} = (x^{-1} y^{-1})^{-1} = ((yx)^{-1})^{-1} = yx\\]<br \/>\nby (*), that is, \\(G\\) is a commutative group.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.4<\/span><br \/>\nShow that the following Cayley table can only be completed in one way so that the elements \\(s,\\) \\(t,\\) \\(u\\) and \\(v\\) constitute a group. Deduce the requisite products, rigorously defending each step.\n<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-01.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"173\" height=\"132\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4940\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-01.png 346w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-01-300x229.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 173px) 100vw, 173px\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-02.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"495\" height=\"130\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4941\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-02.png 990w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-02-300x79.png 300w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-02-768x202.png 768w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-04-02-585x154.png 585w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 495px) 100vw, 495px\" \/>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.5<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(G_0\\) and \\(G_1\\) be groups. Consider the set<br \/>\n\\[G_0 \\times G_1 = \\left\\{ ( s_0 ,\\, s_1 ) \\,\\vert\\, s_0 \\in G_0 ,\\, s_1 \\in G_1 \\right\\}.\\]<br \/>\nThis is just the Cartesian product of the two sets \\(G_0\\) and \\(G_1 .\\) Define an operation on \\(G_0 \\times G_1\\) as follows:<br \/>\n\\[(s_0 ,\\,s_1) (t_0 ,\\,t_1 ) = (s_0 t_0 ,\\, s_1 t_1 )\\]<br \/>\nfor all \\(s_0 ,\\,t_0 \\in G_0\\) and \\(s_1 ,\\,t_1 \\in G_1 .\\) That is, we carry out the product componentwise, making use of the operation defined on the factor groups. Show that \\(G_0 \\times G_1\\) is a group with respect to this operation. Be sure to verify all requisite properties explicitly. This is called the <span class=\"defined\">direct product<\/span> of \\(G_0\\) and \\(G_1 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul class=\"marginbottom0\">\n<li>It is trivial that \\(G_0 \\times G_1\\) is closed under the operation.<\/li>\n<li>Let \\(e_0\\) and \\(e_1 \\) be the identity elements of \\(G_0\\) and \\(G_1\\) respectively. Then \\((e_0 ,\\, e_1 )\\) is the identity element of \\(G_0 \\times G_1 .\\)<\/li>\n<li>Associativity directly comes from that of \\(G_0\\) and \\(G_1 .\\)<\/li>\n<li>Let \\((s ,\\,t)\\) be in \\(G_0 \\times G_1 ,\\) then \\((s^{-1} ,\\, t^{-1})\\) is the inverse element of \\((s ,\\,t)\\), where \\(s^{-1} \\in G_0\\) and \\(t^{-1} \\in G_1 .\\)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.6<\/span><br \/>\nShow that \\(G_0 \\times G_1 \\cong G_1 \\times G_0 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nTake \\(\\phi (( s,\\,t)) = (t,\\,s)\\) then \\(\\phi\\) is an isomorphism from \\(G_0 \\times G_1\\) to \\(G_1 \\times G_0 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.7<\/span><br \/>\nContinuing in the same context, consider the functions<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{gather}<br \/>\n\\rho_0 : G_0 \\times G_1 \\rightarrow G_0 ,\\,\\, (s_0 ,\\, s_1 ) \\mapsto s_0 ,\\\\[7pt]<br \/>\n\\rho_1 : G_0 \\times G_1 \\rightarrow G_1 ,\\,\\, (s_0 ,\\, s_1 ) \\mapsto s_1 .<br \/>\n\\end{gather}\\]<br \/>\nThese are called <span class=\"defined\">projection maps<\/span>. The first, \\(\\rho_0 ,\\) retains the first coordinate and drops the second. The second, \\(\\rho_1 ,\\) retains the second and drops the first. Show that both maps are surjective homomorphisms and compute the kernel of each.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nWLOG, we only have to prove for \\(\\rho_0 .\\)<\/p>\n<ul class=\"marginbottom0\">\n<li>Let \\(e_1\\) be the identity element of \\(G_1 .\\) For any \\(s\\in G_0 ,\\) \\(\\rho_0 (s ,\\,e_1 ) = s ,\\) that is, \\(\\rho_0\\) is surjective.<\/li>\n<li>Let \\((s_0 ,\\,s_1 )\\) and \\((t_0 ,\\,t_1 )\\) be elements of \\(G_0 \\times G_1 .\\) Then<br \/>\n\\[\\rho_0 ((s_0 ,\\,s_1)(t_0 ,\\,t_1)) = \\rho_0 ((s_0 t_0 ,\\, s_1 t_1 )) = s_0 t_0 = \\rho_0 ((s_0 ,\\, s_1 )) \\rho_0 ((t_0 ,\\,t_1 )),\\]<br \/>\nthat is, \\(\\rho_0\\) is a homomorphism.\n<\/li>\n<li>Let \\(e_0\\) be the identity element of \\(G_0 .\\) Then the kernel of \\(\\rho_0\\) is<br \/>\n\\[\\left\\{ (e_0 ,\\, s_1) \\,\\vert\\, s_1 \\in G_1 \\right\\} .\\]\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.8<\/span><br \/>\nConsider the special case of the direct product \\(G \\times G\\) of a group \\(G\\) with itself. Define a subset \\(D\\) of \\(G\\times G\\) by<br \/>\n\\[D = \\left\\{ (s,\\,s) \\,\\vert\\, s\\in G \\right\\}.\\]<br \/>\nThat is, \\(D\\) consists of all elements with both coordinates equal. Show that \\(D\\) is a subgroup of \\(G \\times G.\\) This is called the <span class=\"defined\">diagonal subgroup<\/span>.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nFirst, \\(D\\) is closed under the operation. Besides, for any \\((s,\\,s)\\) and \\((t,\\,t)\\) in \\(D,\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[ s \\in G ,\\,\\, t \\in G ,\\,\\, t^{-1} \\in G ,\\,\\, st^{-1} \\in G \\]<br \/>\nand<br \/>\n\\[ (s,\\,s) (t,\\,t)^{-1} = (s,\\,s)(t^{-1} ,\\,t^{-1}) = (st^{-1} ,\\, st^{-1}) \\in D.\\]<br \/>\nTherefore, by one-step test, \\(D\\) is a subgroup of \\(G.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.9<\/span><br \/>\nConsider the direct product \\(\\mathbb{R} \\times \\mathbb{R}\\) of the additive group of real numbers with itself and the function \\(f:\\mathbb{R} \\times \\mathbb{R} \\rightarrow \\mathbb{R}\\) defined by \\(f(x,\\,y) = 2x-y .\\) Show that \\(f\\) is a homomorphism of groups; describe its kernel and image.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\((x_1 ,\\,y_1 )\\) and \\((x_2 ,\\,y_2 )\\) be elements of \\(\\mathbb{R}\\times\\mathbb{R}.\\) Then<br \/>\n\\[\\begin{align}<br \/>\nf((x_1 ,\\, y_1 ) + (x_2 ,\\,y_2))<br \/>\n&#038;= f((x_1 + x_2 ,\\, y_1 + y_2 )) \\\\[7pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= 2(x_1 + x_2) &#8211; (y_1 + y_2) \\\\[7pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= (2x_1 &#8211; y_1) + (2x_2 &#8211; y_2 ) \\\\[7pt]<br \/>\n&#038;= f((x_1 ,\\,y_1)) + f((x_2 ,\\,y_2)),<br \/>\n\\end{align}\\]<br \/>\nthat is, \\(f\\) is a homomorphism. Its kernel is<br \/>\n\\[\\left\\{ (x,\\,y) \\,\\vert\\, 2x-y = 0 \\right\\}\\]<br \/>\nand its image is \\(\\mathbb{R}.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.10<\/span><br \/>\nShow that the function \\(f: \\mathbb{R} \\rightarrow \\mathbb{R}\\) defined by \\(f(x) = ax+b\\), where \\(a,\\) \\(b\\in\\mathbb{R}\\) and \\(b \\ne 0,\\) is not a homomorphism of additive groups from \\(\\langle \\mathbb{R} ,\\, + \\rangle\\) to itself.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n\\(f(0) \\ne 0.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.11<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(G\\) be a group and consider the additive group of integers \\(\\mathbb{Z}.\\) For any fixed \\(s\\in G,\\) show that the function<br \/>\n\\[\\varphi : \\mathbb{Z} \\rightarrow G ,\\quad n \\mapsto s^n \\]<br \/>\nis a homomorphism. Deduce from this that if \\(G\\) is finite, then \\(\\operatorname{Ker}(\\varphi )\\) is nontrivial and therefore there exists a positive integer \\(m\\) such that \\(s^m = e,\\) where \\(e\\) is the identity element of \\(G.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nFor any integers \\(m\\) and \\(n,\\)<br \/>\n\\[\\varphi(m+n) = s^{m+n} = s^m s^n = \\varphi(m) \\varphi(n),\\]<br \/>\nwhich shows that \\(\\varphi\\) is a homomorphism.<\/p>\n<p>If \\(s=e,\\) then the kernel of \\(\\varphi\\) is \\(\\mathbb{Z}\\) and \\(s^1 = e.\\) If \\(s\\ne e,\\) then the set<br \/>\n\\[S = \\left\\{ s^n \\,\\vert\\, n \\in \\mathbb{Z} \\right\\}\\]<br \/>\nmust contain \\(e = s^0.\\) Now consider the enumeration of elements:<br \/>\n\\[s^1 ,\\, s^2 ,\\, s^3,\\, \\cdots .\\]<br \/>\nSince \\(S\\) has only finite number of elements, there must be two different positive integers \\(i\\) and \\(j\\) such that \\(s^i = s^j .\\) Taking \\(m = \\lvert i-j \\rvert > 0,\\) we have \\(s^m = e.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.12<\/span><br \/>\nUse the previous problem and Proposition 2.6 to show that for each element \\(s\\) of a group \\(G,\\) the subset<br \/>\n\\[\\langle s \\rangle = \\left\\{ s^n \\,\\vert\\, n\\in\\mathbb{Z} \\right\\}\\]<br \/>\nis a subgroup of \\(G.\\) This is called the <span class=\"defined\">cyclic subgroup generated by \\(s\\)<\/span>.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span> Let&#8217;s check the conditions for \\(\\langle s \\rangle\\) to be a group.<\/p>\n<ul class=\"marginbottom0\">\n<li>\\(e = s^0 \\in \\langle s \\rangle .\\)<\/li>\n<li>If \\(s^m\\) and \\(s^n\\) belong to \\(\\langle s \\rangle ,\\) then \\(s^m s^n = s^{m+n} \\in \\langle s \\rangle .\\)<\/li>\n<li>If \\(s^n\\) belongs to \\(\\langle s \\rangle,\\) then \\(s^{-n}\\) is the inverse element in \\(\\langle s \\rangle .\\)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.13<\/span><br \/>\nShow that if \\(H\\) is a subgroup of \\(G\\) and \\(s\\in H,\\) then \\(\\langle s \\rangle \\subseteq H.\\) This means that \\(\\langle s \\rangle\\) is the smallest subgroup of \\(G\\) that contains \\(s.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nFirst, \\(H\\) must contain \\(e = s^0 .\\)<br \/>\nNext, since \\(H\\) is closed under the group operation, \\(s^n \\in H\\) for all positive integers \\(n.\\)<br \/>\nFinally, since \\(s^{-n}\\) is the inverse element of \\(s^n ,\\) \\(s^{-n} \\in H\\) for all positive integers \\(n.\\) Therefore \\(H\\) contains all the elements of \\(\\langle s \\rangle .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.14<\/span><br \/>\nShow that if a subgroup \\(H\\) of \\(\\langle \\mathbb{Z}_4 ,\\, + \\rangle ,\\) the additive group of integers modulo \\(4,\\) contains either \\(1\\) or \\(3,\\) then in fact \\(H = \\mathbb{Z}_4 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIn \\(\\mathbb{Z}_4 ,\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[1+1 =2 ,\\,\\, 2+1 = 3 ,\\,\\, 3+1 = 0\\]<br \/>\nand<br \/>\n\\[3+3 = 2,\\,\\, 2+3 = 1 ,\\,\\, 1+3 = 0.\\]<br \/>\nTherefore each of \\(1\\) and \\(3\\) generates whole \\(\\mathbb{Z}_4 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.15<\/span><br \/>\nFind all subgroups of \\(\\langle \\mathbb{Z}_5 ,\\, + \\rangle ,\\) the additive group of integers modulo \\(5.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nEach nonzero element of \\(\\mathbb{Z}_5\\) generates \\(\\mathbb{Z}_5 .\\) Therefore \\(\\left\\{ 0 \\right\\}\\) and \\(\\mathbb{Z}_5\\) are all the subgroups.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.16<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(\\varphi_1 ,\\) \\(\\varphi_2 : \\mathbb{Z}\\rightarrow G\\) be homomorphisms from the additive group \\(\\mathbb{Z}\\) to an arbitrary group \\(G.\\) Show that if \\(\\varphi_1 (1) = \\varphi_2 (1),\\) then \\(\\varphi_1 = \\varphi_2 .\\) In other words, a group homomorphism from \\(\\mathbb{Z}\\) into any group is completely determined by its action on \\(1.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nFirst, it is trivial that \\(\\varphi_1 (0) = e = \\varphi_2 (0).\\) Next, use mathematical induction for \\(n\\) to prove that \\(\\varphi_1 (n) = \\varphi_2 (n),\\) where \\(n\\) is any natural number. Finally, we have \\[\\varphi_1 (-n) = &#8211; \\varphi_1 (n) = -\\varphi_2 (n) = \\varphi_2 (-n) \\]for a natural number \\(n.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.17<\/span><br \/>\nProve that a permutation and its inverse have the same sign.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince the sign map is a homomorphism, we have \\[\\sigma (\\pi ^{-1} ) = (\\sigma (\\pi ))^{-1}\\]for a permutation \\(\\pi .\\) But \\(\\sigma\\) assumes only \\(\\pm 1\\) and it completes the proof.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.18<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A_n\\) denote the set of all even permutations in \\(S_n ,\\) that is, permutations with sign \\(+1.\\) Show that \\(A_n\\) is a subgroup of \\(S_n .\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nThe sign map \\(\\sigma : S_n \\rightarrow \\left\\{ -1 ,\\, 1 \\right\\}\\) is a homomorphism and \\(A_n\\) is the kernel of the sign map. Therefore \\(A_n\\) is a subgroup of \\(S_n .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem marginbottomhalf\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.19<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(G\\) be a group. For \\(s\\in G,\\) define \\(L_s : G \\rightarrow G\\) by \\(L_s (t) = st\\) for all \\(t\\in G.\\) \\(L_s\\) is thus left multiplication (or, more properly, <span class=\"defined\">left translation<\/span>) by \\(s.\\)\n<\/p>\n<ol class=\"parenthesis marginbottomhalf\">\n<li>Let \\(\\operatorname{Sym}(G)\\) denote the set of all bijections from \\(G\\) to itself, that is, all permutations of \\(G.\\) Show that for each \\(s\\in G,\\) \\(L_s \\in \\operatorname{Sym}(G).\\)<\/li>\n<li>Show that the mapping\\[\\Lambda : G \\rightarrow \\operatorname{Sym}(G) ,\\quad s \\mapsto L_s\\]<br \/>\nis a homomorphism of groups. This amounts to showing that \\(L_{st} = L_s \\circ L_t .\\)<\/li>\n<li>Show that \\(\\Lambda\\) is, moreover, injective. Conclude that every group is isomorphic to a subgroup of a permutation group. This result is called Cayley&#8217;s Theorem.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><\/p>\n<ol class=\"parenthesis marginbottom0\">\n<li>For any \\(x\\in G,\\)<br \/>\n\\[L_s (s^{-1}x) = s(s^{-1})x = x,\\]<br \/>\nwhich shows that \\(L_s\\) is surjective. If \\(L_c (x) = L_c (y)\\) for \\(x,\\) \\(y\\in G,\\) then \\(cx=cy\\) and \\(x=y,\\) which shows that \\(L_s\\) is injective. Therefore \\(L_s\\) is bijective and \\(L_s\\) belongs to \\(\\operatorname{Sym}(G).\\)<\/li>\n<li>For any \\(x\\in G,\\)<br \/>\n\\[L_{st}(x) = stx = s L_t (x) = L_s (L_t (x)) = (L_s \\circ L_t )(x),\\]<br \/>\nthat is, \\(L_{st} = L_s \\circ L_t .\\) Therefore<br \/>\n\\[\\Lambda(st) = L_{st} = L_s \\circ L_t = \\Lambda(s) \\Lambda(t),\\]<br \/>\nwhich shows that \\(\\Lambda\\) is a group-homomorphism.<\/li>\n<li>Suppose \\(\\Lambda(x) =\\Lambda(y)\\) then \\(L_x = L_y \\) and \\[x = L_x (e) = L_y (e) = y,\\]which shows that \\(\\Lambda\\) is injective.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Let \\(H\\) be the range of \\(\\Lambda,\\) then \\(\\Lambda\\) is an isomoprhism from \\(G\\) to \\(H,\\) while \\(G\\) is a subgroup of a permutation group.\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.20<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(A\\) be a ring. Show that \\(A\\) is commutative if and only if the following identity holds:<br \/>\n\\[(a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2 .\\tag{*}\\]\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nIf \\(A\\) is commutative, then (*) holds. Now we prove the converse. Let (*) holds for all \\(a\\) and \\(b.\\) Expanding LHS of (*) and substitute \\(ab + ab\\) into \\(2ab,\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[a^2 + ab + ba + b^2 = a^2 + ab + ab + b^2 .\\]<br \/>\nCancellation law gives that \\(ba = ab,\\) which shows the commutativity.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.21<\/span><br \/>\nGive an example of a commutative ring \\(A\\) such that neither \\(a\\) nor \\(b\\) is \\(0,\\) but \\(ab=0.\\) In this case we say \\(a\\) and \\(b\\) are <span class=\"defined\">zero divisors<\/span>.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nTake \\(A = \\mathbb{Z}_6\\) and \\(a = 2,\\) \\(b=3 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.22<\/span><br \/>\nShow that a field can never have zero divisors; that is, if \\(ab=0,\\) then either \\(a\\) or \\(b\\) is itself equal to \\(0.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSuppose \\(ab =0\\) but \\(a \\ne 0.\\) Then \\(b = a^{-1}(ab) = a^{-1}0 = 0\\) and we have \\(b=0.\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.23<\/span><br \/>\nWrite out both Cayley tables (one for addition, and one for multiplication) for \\(\\mathbb{F}_5 .\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-23.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"448\" height=\"198\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4988\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-23.png 895w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-23-300x132.png 300w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-23-768x339.png 768w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-23-585x258.png 585w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 448px) 100vw, 448px\" \/>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.24<\/span><br \/>\nWrite out both Cayley tables for \\(\\mathbb{Z}_6,\\) the ring of integers modulo \\(6.\\) Show that this ring is not a field.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-24.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"474\" height=\"212\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4989\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-24.png 947w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-24-300x134.png 300w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-24-768x343.png 768w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-24-585x261.png 585w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px\" \/><br \/>\nThis ring has zero divisors \\(2\\) and \\(3,\\) therefore this ring is not a field.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.25<\/span><br \/>\nMore generally show that \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n\\) is not a field whenever \\(n\\) is not a prime number.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince \\(n\\) is not a prime number, there exist positive integers \\(p\\) and \\(q\\) such that \\(n=pq\\) and \\(p < n ,\\) \\(q < n.\\) Then \\(p\\) and \\(q\\) are zero divisors of \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n,\\) which shows that \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n\\) is not a field.\n<\/p>\n<p>(In fact, \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n\\) is a field if and only if \\(n\\) is a prime number.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.26<\/span><br \/>\nA commutative ring without zero divisors is called an <span class=\"defined\">integral domain<\/span>. Show that a commutative ring \\(A\\) is an integral domain if and only if we have the cancellation law<br \/>\n\\[ab =ac \\,\\, \\Rightarrow \\,\\, b=c \\tag{*}\\]<br \/>\nfor all \\(a,\\,b,\\,c \\in A ,\\) \\(a \\ne 0 .\\) Use this result and the Pigeonhole Principle to show that every finite integral domain is a field.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSuppose (*) holds. If \\(a\\) and \\(b\\) were zero divisors, from \\(ab = 0 = a0\\) we have \\(b=0,\\) which is a contradiction. Thus \\(A\\) has no zero divisors. Conversely, suppose that \\(A\\) is an integral domain. If \\(a \\ne 0,\\) then \\(a^{-1}\\) must be in \\(A\\), and from \\(ab = ac\\) we have<br \/>\n\\[b = a^{-1}(ab) = a^{-1}(ac) = c,\\]<br \/>\nwhich proves the cancellation law.\n<\/p>\n<p>Now we prove that every finite integral domain is a field. Suppose \\(D\\) be a finite integral domain, consisting of the elements<br \/>\n\\[0 ,\\,1 ,\\, a_1 ,\\, a_2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, a_n .\\]<br \/>\nIf \\(D\\) consists of \\(0\\) and \\(1\\) only, the proof is done. Therefore, suppose that \\(D\\) has more than \\(2\\) elements, and take any \\(a\\in D\\) such that \\(a \\ne 0\\) nor \\(a \\ne 1.\\) Consider the elements<br \/>\n\\[a1 ,\\, aa_1 ,\\, aa_2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, aa_n .\\tag{**}\\]<br \/>\nNote that none of these elements equals \\(0,\\) since if \\(aa_i = 0 ,\\) then \\(a_i = 0.\\) Furthermore, these elements are all distinct, since if \\(aa_i = aa_j ,\\) then \\(a_i = a_j .\\) Thus these elements are just an rearrangement of the elements<br \/>\n\\[1 ,\\, a_1 ,\\, a_2 ,\\, \\cdots ,\\, a_n .\\]<br \/>\nTherefore one of the enumeration (**) is equals to \\(1,\\) say \\(a1 = 1\\) or \\(aa_k = 1,\\) which implies that \\(a\\) has the multiplicative inverse in \\(D,\\) that is, \\(D\\) is a field.\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.27<\/span><br \/>\nConstruct a field of four elements.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-27.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"413\" height=\"191\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4995\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-27.png 825w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-27-300x139.png 300w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-27-768x355.png 768w, https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/\uc5f0\uc2b5\ubb38\uc81c-02-27-585x270.png 585w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 413px) 100vw, 413px\" \/>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3>Additional Problems<\/h3>\n<p>The following two problems are not included in Valenza&#8217;s book; They are not essential to study linear algebra, while they are frequently stated in abstract algebra.<\/p>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.28<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(m\\) be a element of the ring \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n .\\) Show that \\(m\\) is a zero divisor if and only if \\(m\\) divides \\(n.\\)\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSuppose that \\(d = \\gcd (m,\\,n ) \\ne 1.\\) Since<br \/>\n\\[m \\left( \\frac{n}{d} \\right) = \\left( \\frac{m}{d} \\right) n = 0 ,\\]<br \/>\nwe have \\(m(n\/d)=0 .\\) For \\(m \\ne 0\\) nor \\(n\/d \\ne 0\\) in \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n ,\\) \\(m\\) is a zero divisor of \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n .\\)<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, suppose that \\(m\\) is relative prime to \\(n.\\) If for \\(s\\in\\mathbb{Z}_n\\) we have \\(ms = 0,\\) then \\(n\\) divides \\(ms.\\) Since \\(n\\) is relatively prime to \\(m,\\) \\(n\\) divides \\(s,\\) so \\(s=0\\) in \\(\\mathbb{Z}_n .\\)\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ########## ########## ########## --><\/p>\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.29<\/span><br \/>\nLet \\(p\\) be a prime integer. Show that \\(\\mathbb{Z}_p\\) is a field.\n<\/p>\n<div class=\"solution\">\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span><br \/>\nSince each nonzero element in \\(\\mathbb{Z}_p\\) is not a zero divisor, we have by Problem 2.28 that \\(\\mathbb{Z}_p\\) is an integral domain. Furthermore \\(\\mathbb{Z}_p\\) consists of finite number of elements, we conclude by Problem 2.26 that \\(\\mathbb{Z}_p\\) is a field.\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--\n<!-- ########## ########## ########## --\n\n\n<p class=\"problem\"><span class=\"definition\">Problem 2.<\/span><br \/>\nQ\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"solution\">\n\n\n<p><span class=\"proof\">Solution.<\/span>\nS\n<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>\n\n\n--><\/p>\n<p><!-- --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This set of exercises is retrieved from the second chapter of Linear Algebra by Robert J. Valenza. Note that these solutions are not fully elaborated; You have to fill the descriptions by yourself. Problem 2.1 Give an example of a noncommutative group of \\(24\\) elements. Solution. \\(S_4 .\\) Problem 2.2 Give an example of a group \\(G\\) and a nonempty subset \\(H\\) of \\(G\\)&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[59,57],"tags":[402,408,406,405,400,407,404,403],"class_list":["post-4931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abstract-algebra","category-linear-algebra","tag-exercises","tag-field","tag-group-homomorphism","tag-groups","tag-linear-algebra","tag-ring","tag-solution","tag-tip"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4931"}],"version-history":[{"count":76,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5355,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4931\/revisions\/5355"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sasamath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}